Magnified Effects of Changes in NIH Research Funding Levels.
نویسندگان
چکیده
What happens within the university-based research enterprise when a federal funding agency abruptly changes research grant funding levels, up or down? We use simple difference equation models to show that an apparently modest increase or decrease in funding levels can have dramatic effects on researchers, graduate students, postdocs, and the overall research enterprise. The amplified effect is due to grants lasting for an extended period, thereby requiring the majority of funds available in one year to pay for grants awarded in previous years. We demonstrate the effect in various ways, using National Institutes of Health data for two situations: the historical doubling of research funding from 1998 to 2003 and the possible effects of "sequestration" in January 2013. We posit human responses to such sharp movements in funding levels and offer suggestions for amelioration.
منابع مشابه
Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists?
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The h-index is an accurate and reliable indicator of scholarly productivity that takes into account relevance, significance, and influence of research contributions. As such, it is an effective, objective bibliometric that can be used to evaluate academic otolaryngologists for decisions regarding appointment and advancement. In this study, we evaluate the impact of NIH fun...
متن کاملEffects of Changes in Federal Funding for Academic Life Sciences R&D: Crowding-In versus Crowding-Out in the Post-Doubling Era
This paper evaluates effectiveness of federal research funding in stimulating universities’ total research and development (R&D), over a period of dramatic change in the federal funding environment. Instrumental variables estimation reveals that during the NIH budget doubling, 1998—2003, each federal research dollar spurred an additional $0.27 in subsequent research funding from nonfederal sour...
متن کاملNIH funding trajectories and their correlations with US health dynamics from 1950 to 2004.
To determine optimal future National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding levels, the longitudinal correlation of the level of investment in NIH research with population changes in the risk of specific diseases should be analyzed. This is because NIH research is the primary source of new therapies and treatments for major chronic diseases, many of which were viewed as relatively untreatable in th...
متن کاملAn update: NIH research funding for palliative medicine 2006 to 2010.
BACKGROUND Palliative care clinical and educational programs are expanding to meet the needs of seriously ill patients and their families. Multiple reports call for an enhanced palliative care evidence base. OBJECTIVE To examine current National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding of palliative medicine research and changes since our 2008 report. METHODS We sought to identify NIH funding of ...
متن کاملNIH Disease Funding Levels and Burden of Disease
BACKGROUND An analysis of NIH funding in 1996 found that the strongest predictor of funding, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), explained only 39% of the variance in funding. In 1998, Congress requested that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) evaluate priority-setting criteria for NIH funding; the IOM recommended greater consideration of disease burden. We examined whether the association bet...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Service science
دوره 4 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012